Hazan, C., & Diamond, L. M. (2000). The spot from connection into the person mating. Summary of Standard Mindset, 4(2), 186–204.

Kraut, Roentgen., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, A. (2002). Websites paradox revisited. Diary from Societal Factors, 58(1), 49–74.

Kraut, R., Patterson, Yards., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukophadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Websites contradiction: A social technology you to decrease societal involvement and you will psychological really-becoming? American Psychologist, 53(9), 1017–1031.

Kreider, Roentgen.Meters., & Sphere, J. Yards. (2001). Amount, timing, and you will time of marriage ceremonies and you can divorces. Current Populace Account, 70-80, (Washington, DC: You.S. Census Agency, 2005).

Lemieux, Roentgen., & Hale, J. L. (2002). Cross-sectional study of closeness, welfare, and you will union: Assessment the fresh new presumptions of triangular theory of love. Mental Account, 90(step 3,Pt1), 1009-1014. doi:/PR0.90.step three.1009-1014

Lockwood, P., Dolderman, D., Sadler, P., & Gerchak, Age. (2004). Perception greatest regarding performing even worse: Personal contrasting within close relationship. Diary of Identification and you may Public Psychology, 87(1), 80–95.

Maner, J. K., Miller, S. L., Rouby, D. A., & Gailliot, Yards. T. (2009). Intrasexual vigilance: The fresh implicit cognition away from romantic rivalry. Diary from Identification and you will Social Mindset, 97(1), 74–87.

An excellent. (2001)mitment and you can relationship repairs mechanisms

Maner, J. K., Rouby, D. A beneficial., & Gonzaga, G. C. (2008). Automated inattention so you can attractive choice: The fresh changed therapy out of dating maintenance. Advancement and Individual Conclusion, 29(5), 343–349.

pold, B. E. (1981). Sequential analysis out of disagreement and you may agreement when you look at the disturb and you can nondistressed relationship partners. Record out of Consulting and you can Scientific Mindset, 49(4), kirgisisk til Г¦gteskab 554–567.

McKenna, K. Y. A great., Eco-friendly, A good. S., Gleason, Meters. J. (2002). Relationship creation on the internet: What is the big destination? Diary from Public Facts, 58(1), 9–29.

The key benefits of self-confident illusions: Idealization and also the design away from pleasure during the romantic relationship

Neff, L. Good., & Karney, B. Roentgen. (2002). Self-evaluation motives for the close matchmaking: A style of worldwide enhancement and you may specific confirmation. For the P. Noller & J. An effective. Feeney (Eds.), Wisdom ents regarding the study of few telecommunications (pp. 32–58). Nyc, NY: Cambridge College Press.

Obegi, J. H. (2008). The development of the consumer-therapist thread from the contact regarding connection idea. Psychotherapy: Idea, Look, Routine, Training, 45(4), 431-446. doi:/a0014330

Pickett, C. L., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). This new social overseeing program: Improved sensitiveness so you can personal signs since the an adaptive response to societal exception. When you look at the K. D. Williams, J. P. Forgas, & W. von Hippel (Eds.), The brand new personal outcast: Ostracism, personal exception to this rule, getting rejected, and you will bullying (pp. 213–226). Ny, NY: Psychology Drive.

Pierce, T., & Lydon, J. Elizabeth. (2001). Around the world and you can certain relational designs about exposure to societal affairs. Journal from Personality and Societal Psychology, 80(4), 613–631.

Rholes, W. S., Simpson, J. Good., Tran, S., ). Attachment and you will guidance looking to into the close matchmaking. Identification and Personal Therapy Bulletin, 33(3), 422–438.

Ross, L. Roentgen., & Spinner, B. (2001). Standard and you will particular attachment representations into the adulthood: Can there be a relationship?. Log Of Social And private Dating, 18(6), 747-766. doi:407501186001

Rusbult, C. E., Olsen, Letter., Davis, J. L., & Hannon, P. Inside the J. Harvey & An effective. Wenzel (Eds.), Romantic intimate dating: Fix and you may enhancement (pp. 87–113). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Schul, Y., & Vinokur, A good. D. (2000). Projection myself impression certainly spouses since the a function of new similarity inside their mutual event. Personality And you will Public Therapy Bulletin, 26(8), 987-1001. doi:1672002610008

Seligman, C., Fazio, Roentgen. H., & Zanna, M. P. (1980). Ramifications of salience away from extrinsic perks towards the preference and you can loving. Record out of Identity and you will Public Therapy, 38(3), 453–460.