step 1. But really, when you look at the genealogy, each of us knowthat for every single code you will find a difference. A good vexing area ofgenealogy is that no-one very understands just how to make use of brand new conditions orrules that have one definitive adjective such as for example constantly, maybe, probably,more than likely, etcetera. It might be fascinating when the indeed there other instances ofjointures getting produced per year otherwise a few just after a known marriage day.
dos. Could there be an enthusiastic extant dispensation on matrimony out of ElizabethClifford and Sir Ralph Bowes who were third cousins through Henry Fitzhugh,3rd Lord Fitzhugh or next cousins, immediately after removed from the newest 5th LordClifford? That would restrict its wedding go out.
Arthur
Presumably, if the a good dispensation try needed and granted, it could havebeen by the among following the, and may also can be found in the new correspondingregister guide, when it endures:
Thomas Savage, Archbishop from York 1501-1507Christopher Bainbridge, Bishop of Durham 1507-1508, Archbishop of York1508-1514William Senhouse, Bishop out-of Durham 1502-1505Thomas Ruthall, Bishop out-of Durham 1509-1523Richard Leyburn, Bishop out of Carlisle 1502-1508John Penny, Bishop out of Carlisle 1509-1520
5. If the tenth Lord Clifford do wed during the early 1487 [state January] andhas E after because seasons, really does the chronology maybe not functions?
John possession?
Elizabeth born inside the later 1487, Henry produced during the 1488/9, Joan in the ,etcetera. filling out the newest brands of the upload off . In the event that (a) thechronology nevertheless performs; and you will (b) their own matrimony piece was not reduced; thenwe only have the new 1505 pedigree from Henry VII’s that’s in the oppositionto the newest supposition one she are a legitimate daughter.
six. Concerning your 1505 pedigree: Could be the Clifford daughters the fresh new onlyknown Henry VII connections omitted? Have there been anyone else? In this case,wouldn’t you to echo defectively on this subject file since a source?
Of comparisons We have made of the fresh c.1505 Henry VII Interactions pedigreeswith the fresh 1480-1500 Visitation of Northern pedigrees, which are
About c.1505 Relations pedigrees, the fresh Clifford children are maybe not listedin a beneficial Clifford pedigree, but alternatively throughout the St. John pedigree. Because the I’mnot accustomed the fresh St. John household members, adopting the is the pointers asit seems regarding c.1505 pedigree, because the obtained from the brand new 1834 Coll. Greatest. etGen. blog post. New phrasing for the quotations is exactly because looks inthe 1834 blog post (pp. 310-311).
“No. XII.”Away from my Lord Welles child, Sir Richard Rod, Mistress Verney, SirJohn St. John, along with other.”f.288, 296, 317, 318.”Margaret Duchess out-of Somerset got three husbands.” Because of the “John Duke ofSomerset” she got “My Woman the King’s Mom.” who’d “The Queen.” whohad “Prince “By “Sir Oliver Saint John, very first spouse.” she got step 3 daus & dos sons:
A good. “Edith, wedded so you’re able to Geoffrey Pole regarding Buckinghamshire.” They had:A1. “Sir Richard Rod, Knt. wedded on the Woman Margaret, dau. out-of theDuke from Clarence.” That they had: “Harry. “A2. “Alianor, married to help you Ralph Verney, Esq.” They had: “John Verney.—– [youngster, unnamed]. ——-[a new child, unnamed].”
B. “John Ssint John, esq.” He previously four students:B1. “Sir John Saint John, Knight.” who had “Five daughters and you may oneson.”B2. “Anne, wedd. so you’re able to Harry Lord Clifford.” kissbrides.com besГ¶k webbplatsen They’d “Jane. Mabill.Henry, young buck and you will heir. Anne. Thomas. Alianor.”B3. “E, wedded to help you Thomas Kent, Esq. out-of Lincolnshire.”B4. “A good Nun from Shaftesbury.”B5. “Oliver Saint John.”
C. “Dame Mary, married to help you Sir Richard Frognall.” They had:C1. “Edmond Frognall with his brethren and you will sistren.” Which have issueindicated, not named.C2. “Age, married so you’re able to Sir William Gascoigne, Knt.”
D. “E, married basic into the Lord Zouche; just after into the LordScrope out-of Bolton.” Issue:D1. [from the Zouche] ” Catesby.” That they had:”E. George. John. William.”D2. [by Scrope] ” Conyers.” Having issueindicated but not named.
Margaret Duchess regarding Somerset, of the “Lionel Lord Welles, last partner.”had: “John Viscount Welles, wedded Cecily, dau. away from K. Edward IV.” andthey had “Elizabeth.”