Re: Wingfield Coats-of-Palms
The fresh new Tickencote picture generally seems to date out-of no less than 1650 according to web page 3of Some Information of your own Wingfield Nearest and dearest from the Wingfield, John M.London: Murray, 1925 republished because of the Wingfield Family members Area inside the 1991. ISBN0-nine37543-03-9.
“Sir Robert Wyngfeld away from Letheringham, his [Sir Robert who d. ily away from half a dozen or 7 sons and fivedaughters, and is out of your, with his youngsters and you can grandchildren,whom starred zero small-part on products of the world of The united kingdomt, one to thepresent work [Wingfield’s guide] food.
His eldest young buck try Sir John Wyngfeld of Letheringham, Knight, who, having hiswife, form both main numbers in the dated pedigree oil illustrations whichprovide the subject of these records.
There’s two ones oictures available, almost identically exactly the same, oneat Tickencote Hall, Rutland, and almost every other during the Boughton Domestic, Northants. Itis not known the brand spanking new and you may which is the backup.
It couple is actually encircled on finest and you can base data by the all their sixteen people, inside the for every circumstances Wingfield home (1) Bosville and you can (2) american man and Jackson, MN women every quarter, Goushell additionally the chequy layer
Usually the one within Tickncote, now owned by Lieut.-Col. John MauriceWingfield, try painted for the fabric, and it has probably been there as the about1650, as it’s most likely it had been the house of last SirRobert Wingfield of Upton, inside Northamptonshire, who’s said to enjoys diedduring new commonwealth, and many from whoever petroleum sketches got at the thattime removed so you’re able to their cousin’s family at the Tickencote, whenever Upton is offered, andwhich will always be around.”
The author says one “the image in the Boughton family could easily be tracedback to help you 1677″ (web page cuatro) and supply several comments from the middle 1700srefering in order to direction of your photo as well as presentation on Duke ofMontague.
The writer says toward webpage 6 you to “Whenever, otherwise of the whose buy, or by the who they waspainted, continues to be a question undecided by masters.”
Once again, my questions towards the class heart perhaps not in the genealogicalconnections regarding the participants, (this new Wingfields have been explored fairlywell, and you will despite my personal typo toward Howard loved ones, I really do have the pedigreeaccurately annotated in RI) but towards reason of which protects weredisplayed because of the second several years. I do believe You will find a sense of what”should” be on this new respective shields, and you will are thinking as to why, in this case,that will not appear to be what’s revealed. Sometimes I am misleading inside myunderstanding, or the Wingfield’s had been to tackle pretty timely and you may loose withtheir fingers for some purpose and that we would not even understand.
Kelly, many thanks for giving me personally photos, and as a consequence of Tim getting rescuing me personally the situation off placing them on the web. Searching which more than along with the pedigrees from inside the Viscount Powerscourt’s _Muniments of the Old Saxon Group of Wingfield_, the firm became clear in my experience; it also appears that discover you to definitely glaring heraldic error, inside the middle, even the way to obtain your frustration. I’m able to know We haven’t twice-searched all of the youngsters’ impalings and i get one almost every other unanswered concern (what’s the coroneted lozenge regarding the down register?). The newest yellow contours seem to superimposed on this subject visualize regarding publication commonly for example useful, together with annotated ‘key’ doesn’t in fact reproduce the language captions and you may cannot describe anyone whose hands get.
There are two main fascinating things to the picture suggesting a couple various other centers. First, they focuses on a fifteenth-century relationships and you can shows the children of that matrimony, but zero later topic. 2nd, they shows an equity part that have origin right down to the newest seventeenth century.
New central panel is the relationship of Sir John Wingfield (d. 1481) to Elizabeth, dau. from Sir John Fitz Lewis and you will Anne (Montacute). The two numbers kneel in the middle, as they are surmounted of the impalings of their parents’ hands inside the wreaths. New heraldic error is here now, as Sir John’s dad’s conclusion each other house and you may impales Gousell (in fact, Gousell quartered with this particular chequy finish). This can be a blunder. It is visible that quartering of Gousell and chequy coat is available in when this occurs, this can not be one another quartered and you may impaled in the wreath (unless, by implication, Sir John exactly who d. 1481 had drawn an Oedipus and you can hitched his personal mother). Something I don’t admit is the coroneted lozenge hanging over the students from the straight down sign in.