Re: Wingfield Coats-of-Palms
The brand new Tickencote photo appears to go out off at the least 1650 in respect in order to page 3of Certain Facts of Wingfield Loved ones by Wingfield, John Meters.London: Murray, 1925 republished of the Wingfield Members of the family People during the 1991. ISBN0-937543-03-9.
“Sir Robert Wyngfeld away from Letheringham, their [Sir Robert whom d. ily from half dozen otherwise eight sons and you may fivedaughters, and it is off your, with his college students and you can grandchildren,just who played no small-part from the factors of your own domain out of England, one to thepresent works [Wingfield’s guide] food.
Their eldest child is Sir John Wyngfeld away from Letheringham, Knight, exactly who, that have hiswife, mode the two main rates from the dated pedigree petroleum paintings whichprovide the main topic of this info.
There are two ones oictures available, nearly identically the same, oneat Tickencote Hallway, Rutland, in addition to almost every other within Boughton House, Northants. Itis not known which is the brand new and you will the duplicate.
Which partners are encircled about best and you will bottom information by the almost all their 16 students, inside for each and every case Wingfield home (1) Bosville and you will (2) every quarter, Goushell therefore the chequy layer
The main one on Tickncote, today owned by Lieut.-Col. John MauriceWingfield, is actually decorated for the material, and has probably had the experience given that about1650, as it is probably which was actually the house or property of your own past SirRobert Wingfield from Upton, for the Northamptonshire, that is considered has actually diedduring new commonwealth, and some of whose oil illustrations had been on thattime removed to help you his cousin’s house at the Tickencote, whenever Upton try marketed, andwhich are still here.”
The writer claims that “the picture when you look at the Boughton household could easily be tracedback to help you 1677″ (web page 4) and provide a number of statements on middle 1700srefering in order to way of your own photo and its own demonstration on the Duke ofMontague.
The writer states with the web page 6 that “Whenever, otherwise by the whose purchase, otherwise by who it waspainted, is still a concern uncertain from the experts.”
Once again, my concerns toward category center maybe not in the genealogicalconnections off the participants, (this new Wingfields were explored fairlywell, and you can despite my typo toward Howard relatives, I really do have the pedigreeaccurately annotated in RI) however, into the logic at which protects weredisplayed by the second a couple of years. In my opinion We have an idea of what”should” get on the fresh new respective shields, and you will in the morning curious why, in this instance,that does not be seemingly what is actually shown. Both I’m mistaken for the myunderstanding, or even the Wingfield’s was in fact to tackle quite timely and you may reduce withtheir palms for the majority objective hence we could possibly not even know.
Kelly, thanks for giving myself pictures, and you can as a result of Tim getting saving myself the difficulty from putting them online. Looking it over along with the pedigrees during the Viscount Powerscourt’s _Muniments of Ancient Saxon Group jdate Dating of Wingfield_, the firm has started to become clear for me; additionally, it appears that there is certainly you to definitely blazing heraldic mistake, inside the middle, perhaps the way to obtain their confusion. I can admit We have not twice-featured most of the youngsters’ impalings and i also have one most other unanswered question (what’s the coroneted lozenge throughout the straight down register?). The fresh purple outlines appear to superimposed with this image on publication commonly for example of good use, and annotated ‘key’ cannot in fact duplicate what captions and you can doesn’t define individuals whoever hands are offered.
There have been two interesting things to the picture suggesting a couple various other centers. Very first, they focuses on a 15th-century wedding and you may shows the children of that relationships, but zero afterwards procedure. Second, they suggests an equity part with origin as a result of the latest seventeenth century.
This new central panel ‘s the matrimony regarding Sir John Wingfield (d. 1481) to help you Elizabeth, dau. out of Sir John Fitz Lewis and you may Anne (Montacute). Both data kneel at the center, and generally are surmounted of the impalings of the parents’ arms in wreaths. Brand new heraldic error has arrived, since Sir John’s dad’s end each other home and you will impales Gousell (actually, Gousell quartered with this chequy layer). That is a blunder. It’s noticeable that quartering out-of Gousell in addition to chequy layer comes in at that point, so it can not be one another quartered and you can impaled regarding the wreath (except if, by the implication, Sir John whom d. 1481 got removed a keen Oedipus and hitched their own mommy). Something I do not know ‘s the coroneted lozenge hanging above the students on the down check in.